<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Social Network Demographics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jamesbeldock.com/2008/09/09/more-social-network-demographics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jamesbeldock.com/2008/09/09/more-social-network-demographics/</link>
	<description>James G. Beldock's blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:30:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Bookmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesbeldock.com/2008/09/09/more-social-network-demographics/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Bookmarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesbeldock.com/?p=118#comment-270</guid>
		<description>I don\&#039;t normally leave comments... but I really enjoyed your post! I will be leaving a link back here in my blogroll! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don\&#8217;t normally leave comments&#8230; but I really enjoyed your post! I will be leaving a link back here in my blogroll! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Beldock</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesbeldock.com/2008/09/09/more-social-network-demographics/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>James Beldock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesbeldock.com/?p=118#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Michel is absolutely right:  there is methodological inconsistency, and I&#039;m going to make that clear in the post.  However, I *did* correct for age (i.e., converted age of user to likely age at college graduation).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michel is absolutely right:  there is methodological inconsistency, and I&#8217;m going to make that clear in the post.  However, I *did* correct for age (i.e., converted age of user to likely age at college graduation).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel Floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesbeldock.com/2008/09/09/more-social-network-demographics/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel Floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesbeldock.com/?p=118#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Hey James, you&#039;ve got a bit of an apples v oranges comparison here!  Blow&#039;s data is based on total users by age whereas yours is based on % of graduating class.  So to compare effectively you at least need to know the distribution of the population by age (census has this).  Secondly it&#039;s not clear if your data is based only on college graduates, which are a small subsection of the population and which also have higher incomes and higher rates of internet connectivity.

Still, reversing Blow&#039;s chart and overlaying it is pretty cute - I remember college profs doing this with viewfoils (which puts me in the demographic with only a 7% probability of being in a social network ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey James, you&#8217;ve got a bit of an apples v oranges comparison here!  Blow&#8217;s data is based on total users by age whereas yours is based on % of graduating class.  So to compare effectively you at least need to know the distribution of the population by age (census has this).  Secondly it&#8217;s not clear if your data is based only on college graduates, which are a small subsection of the population and which also have higher incomes and higher rates of internet connectivity.</p>
<p>Still, reversing Blow&#8217;s chart and overlaying it is pretty cute &#8211; I remember college profs doing this with viewfoils (which puts me in the demographic with only a 7% probability of being in a social network <img src='http://www.jamesbeldock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
